WHAT HAPPENS WHEN CORRUPT JUDGES DISREGARD FACTS, LOGIC, REASON AND THEIR OATH FOR PERSONAL BENEFIT? PART 3
Failure to Perform Duties Competently: This includes failing to make decisions based on the law and facts presented, ignoring evidence, or not applying the law correctly.
CHRISTOS
MAY 9, 2024
USACN third party republished May 10, 2024
What a crazy world we live in today. The rule of law is dead. Judges and (S)elected officials violate their oaths of office, disregard the Constitution, and act in the most self serving ways.
Take Federal Judge Stephanie Gallagher, yesterday the Barack Obama appointee curiously dismissed the highly anticipated Maryland Election Integrity case between Maryland Election Integrity Inc and United
Sovereign Americans vs Maryland State Board of Elections.
[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.usacitizensnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/730977179-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-MD-Dismissal-Election-Integrity.pdf”]
One of the curious issues is why would the Obama appointed federal judge dismiss the case before the defendant Maryland State Board of Elections even responded to the Plaintiff’s most recently filed motions that clearly demonstrated the countless felonies and the actual disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of Maryland voters during both the 2020 and 2022 Maryland elections.
Response 1
Response 2
This would not be the first time that the Obama appointed federal judge disregarded the rule of law, facts and evidence of widespread election fraud and massive violations of several hundred thousand Maryland voters Constitutional right to cast ballots in elections and have their votes accurately counted. In 2023 this very same federal judge disregarded the Federal Rules of Procedure and promptly dismissed the Gibson Group vs Maryland lawsuit without ruling on pending motions once presented with the same facts and evidence of widespread election fraud by the Maryland State Board of Elections and the actual disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of Maryland voters. That case is currently on appeal with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
It seems to appear that this Federal Judge might have a conflict of interest, and more importantly has established a pattern of Failure to Perform Duties Competently: This includes failing to make decisions based on the law and facts presented, ignoring evidence, or not applying the law correctly. Both of which are violations of Judicial Canons.
Once the newly discovered facts and evidence was submitted to the court the illustrious Judge Gallagher promptly closed the case and restricted access of the filed documents in PACER.
Upgrade to paid
Why would a Federal Judge do that?
Is not the right of “We the People” to cast ballots in elections and have their votes counted accurately one of the most important Constitutional rights that exists?
What was at issue in this case?
Standing was one of the issues raised, is the right of approximately 200K Maryland voters to cast a ballot, and have their votes counted accurately not “a legally cognizable interest, or ‘personal stake’ in the outcome of the action” ?
When hundreds of thousands of Maryland voters’ right to cast ballots in two Federal elections are interfered with and they are actually disenfranchised this is precisely why this case was the proper venue for this highly specific grievance. Especially, when there is the very high likelihood that this treasonous disenfranchisement of voters and the nullification and disregard of the will of “We the People” will continue in another Federal election.
Share
Why would a Federal Judge rule this way when the evidence of disenfranchisement and widespread election fraud on the part of the Maryland State Board of Elections?
Is the right of a Maryland voter to cast a ballot and have their votes accurately counted “‘an invasion of a legally protected interest’ that is ‘concrete and particularized’ and ‘actual or imminent’ ’’?
What if the violation of the legally protected interest was BOTH actual and imminent as in this case? The facts and evidence of this was so irrefutable that the Maryland Attorney General chose to not even dispute these facts and merely claimed that nothing could be done because the timeline for the primary election was too close.
In yet another instance of ignoring irrefutable facts, evidence and the rule of law the Obama appointed Judge claimed in a footnote, that even if there was standing on the part of the plaintiffs, she claimed that there was a lack of diligence and that there was an unreasonable delay in filing suit.
Apparently, the 400+ pages of emails and communications trying to compel the Maryland State Board of Elections to stop violating election laws, and stop disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of Maryland voters though the illegal administration of elections with compromised voting machines was a lack of diligence.
An even more surprising assertion is the claim that too much time had passed. Concerned voters in Maryland, upon discovering that they were being disenfranchised due to numerous violations of both federal and state election laws by the Maryland State Board of Elections, realized that their right to vote in federal elections had been compromised. They learned that Maryland had not conducted or certified a legal election since 2014. In response, they swiftly formed Maryland Election Integrity Inc. in January 2024, aiming to file a lawsuit by March 2024—a timeline that this morally questionable Judge claims is unreasonable.
Most shocking about the footnote is that the illustrious and wise Judge Gallagher totally disregards the fact that the Maryland State Board of Elections has not conducted a legal election since 2014 and she has no problem with allowing the Maryland State Board of Elections to continue to illegally administer elections on voting machines with no valid certification, that are not counting ballots or votes accurately, and that are DISENFRANCHISING MARYLAND VOTERS…
Give a gift subscription
Do you think that would violate a Judicial Canon or two?
If an officer of the court is made aware of felonies or treason being committed and they have a duty to act, they have effectively established criminal intent.
There is also a long established legal doctrine of Willful Blindness and Deliberate Indifference. Clearly, all three could be alleged here.
FUN FACT: Failure to report felonies and treason is a crime…
Do you think that judicial corruption a problem in America today?
Share
You’re currently a free subscriber to Immutable Truth – Election Integrity. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Upgrade to paid
LIKE
COMMENT
RESTACK
© 2024 Christos
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe
Start writing
Reply
Forward
