Home Constitutions Bill of Rights Advocacy: Federal & State Hoopes and Stenstrom: SCOTUS Case No. 24-430 – Strategic Update & Call for Support

Hoopes and Stenstrom: SCOTUS Case No. 24-430 – Strategic Update & Call for Support

Dear Co-Petitioners, Friends and Supporters, Attached are the latest filings and key legal motions in our Supreme Court case No. 24-430, a case with the potential to set a landmark precedent on federal agency accountability. Reconsideration conference is scheduled for March 7th. Our Writ of Mandamus and Petition for Reconsideration in Supreme Court Case No. 24-430 seek to force federal agencies to comply with the law and prevent them from violating statutes through internal policy. This case is critical to rein in administrative overreach and restore legal accountability and will provide President Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, state attorneys general, and Pro Se litigants a critical judicial tool to enforce the law.

by USA Citizens Network
0 comment

Third-Party Re Publication 2/23/25 USA CN

SCOTUS Case No. 24-430 – Strategic Update & Call for Support
Dear Co-Petitioners, Friends and Supporters,
Attached are the latest filings and key legal motions in our Supreme Court case No. 24-430, a case with the potential to set a landmark precedent on federal agency accountability. Reconsideration conference is scheduled for March 7th.

Our Writ of Mandamus and Petition for Reconsideration in Supreme Court Case No. 24-430 seek to force federal agencies to comply with the law and prevent them from violating statutes through internal policy. This case is critical to rein in administrative overreach and restore legal accountability and will provide President Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, state attorneys general, and Pro Se litigants a critical judicial tool to enforce the law.

If successful, this case will stand alongside:

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 143 S. Ct. 2429 (2023) – Overturned Chevron deference, limiting agency power.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) – Clarified standing to sue the government.
Our case (In Re Stenstrom et al v. US Attorney General, No. 24-430) – Would establish a third key precedent preventing agencies from obstructing due process and violating federal law.
Obstruction at SCOTUS
Despite the case’s significance, political appointees within the Supreme Court Clerk’s and Marshal’s offices have unlawfully obstructed our filings from reaching Justices Alito and Thomas. This includes the repeated interception of our Rule 22 and 23 emergency applications—an unprecedented violation of SCOTUS procedures and federal law.

Immediate Actions Needed
✅ SCOTUS-Barred Attorneys & State AG Support – We need attorneys and AGs to file amicus briefs immediately in support of reconsideration and emergency relief. If you have connections, please introduce us or share their information today.
✅ Financial Support – Contributions help fund filing fees, case research, and strategic litigation. Please contact me directly via email or phone.
✅ Spread Awareness – Forward this email, share our case details, and alert legal professionals who can help.

This is a defining moment. With your help, we can prevent federal agencies from ignoring the law and ensure justice is restored.

We must act now—if you can help in any way, please reach out today.

Best,
Gregory Stenstrom
Pro Se Co-Petitioner – SCOTUS Case No. 24-430
Phone: (856) 264-5495
Email: gregorystenstrom@gmail.com

Share This

You May Also Like

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're OK with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More