USA CN Third party re-publication 11/4/24
Fwd: Judicial Watch – Request for Motion for Leave to Intervene and Request for Expedited Consideration
All,
I learned yesterday that the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court has obstructed our Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Motion to Expedite since Oct 7th, 2024 and withheld it from the Justices, and specifically Justice Alito, who by rules of civil procedure would be the Justice to both grant the order to expedite, and present the Writ in conference with the Justices. This willful obstruction by an Obama inserted Clerk 11 years ago violated multiple criminal codes.
We have been fortunate to have a contact with Judicial Watch, who may be willing to intervene and submit a Motion to Intervene and Expedite review by SCOTUS. If they do so, it would greatly increase the odds of success and bring national attention to the Writ and issues involved. I prepared a full package for their review and submission to the electronic docket for SCOTUS which would bypass the Chief Clerk’s obstruction (see email below and attached documents).
We have also been obstructed and slow rolled in the Eastern District Court (EDC) of Pennsylvania by Chief Justice Goldberg in our federal cases. This became evident only this past week and in a court hearing on Thursday past where I argued with Judge Goldberg for over an hour to try and convince him to do his duty, to no avail. I am remedying that with filings directly to the Third Circuit Court requesting their intervention and assuming original jurisdiction in the cases that were timely submitted to the EDC.
We have been similarly obstructed with unlawful rulings and judicial misconduct in the lower Common Pleas courts of Delaware County, Montgomery County, Chester County, Fayett County, and the Commonwealth Court by judicial misconduct that I have carefully documented, and will be submitting some of those cases for review by the Third Circuit, and with SCOTUS after the election, as well.
We have evidence and admissions in Courts by Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth for Elections Jonathon Marks of election machines not being tested and validated across PA, and hard evidence – submitted in court – of unauthorized code embedded in the election machines, and hash codes (software fingerprints) that do not match with EAC authorized code. We also have admissions in Delaware County that Mail in Ballots were unlawfully provided to unqualified electors, and this is the case across the State – which was rejected by federal President Judge Mitchell Goldberg of the EDC as essentially “too close” to the election to remedy – an unlawful ruling – which I am remedying with the Third Circuit and will file as praecipes to the SCOTUS Writ. Lastly, we have video evidence and documented incident reports in Montgomery County of drop box stuffing and unlawful ballot harvesting – and admissions by the Director of Elections there of unlawful conduct – that I will be submitted directly to the Third Circuit by tomorrow monring. I have submitted hundreds of documents and filings with the courts and apologize for being hard to contact this past week with the effort to get as many as possible into the courts as possible.
Currently, Quinnepec polls show President Trump is behind Harris in PA by 49-47 percent. From the data I am seeing, the RNC and Trump campaign staff – which has worked against us – strategy of “too big to rig” has been a failure. As a naval officer and computer scientist, I know that no system is “too big to rig.” The fix in PA is in, and I believe the election has already been stolen with the collusion and active corraboration of corrupt and/or activist judges and corrupt election officials. Only a miracle will change that at this point – which I always pray for but from experience have seen God is sparing of. Pray that I am wrong. I want to be wrong.
I have foregone pressing for several of the tactical counteractions I had hoped we could implement before Tuesday to mitigate the election fraud being perpetrated and instead focused on putting the litigative stakes in the ground – with all of you – that will be necessary to present to the legislatures, the Congress and the courts to demonstrate the election fraud we have witnessed and the installation of another illegitimate government.
Whether Harris is proclaimed president on Tuesday or Wednesday, in which case we will have to fight an unlawful certification, or President Trump prevails, in which case Congressman Jamie Raskin has pledged to go to Civil War over rather than certifying, it will be a fight the whole way. November 5th was never my goal line – January 20th, 2025 is the immediate goal line, and even after that, it will be an 8-to-12 year fight to reclaim our country from a concerted 50 year effort by “The Council” to take it from us.
I was trained along with several others addressed here to fight from the bridges of a warship, combat information centers, and on sea, air, and land in other warfare specialities in younger days. Now our battlegrounds are from keyboards and talking and networking with people on social media and podcasts. We will continue to make do with those, but we have to assume these communication capabilities will be taken from us at some point, which is why I am pressing so hard to get as much into the courts and filing as much paperwork as I can to ensure we are ready if the only tools left are printing presses and the spoken word.
John Quincy Adams stated “Duty is Ours, result’s are God’s.” I believe we have all done our duty, and we will continue to do so using the venues of the Courts and the media to diligently, deliberately and peacefully do our best to preserve our nation.
Pray for our nation and our loved ones. God Bless.
Gregory
**********************************
Dear Sir,
I am reaching out to request Judicial Watch’s immediate assistance with the submission of critical filings to the United States Supreme Court in Case No. 24-430: In re Gregory Stenstrom et al.. Given the imminent November 5 election, timely intervention by the Court is essential to address the urgent constitutional and procedural issues presented in this case.
I have included drafts of all necessary documents to complete filing by Judicial Watch to expedite the process (attached).
The preferred course of action is to file a Motion for Leave to Intervene, along with a Request for Expedited Consideration. Filing electronically with the Court is crucial for expediting the process, as physical booklet production and delivery for an Amicus Brief would likely delay the Court’s review. The Motion to Intervene and associated request for expedited handling provide a direct path to secure immediate Court action.
In addition to the Motion to Intervene and Request for Expedited Consideration, I have also included a Draft Amicus Brief for your review, should Judicial Watch prefer this route. This Amicus Brief is structured to support Petitioners by presenting comprehensive arguments on the constitutional implications, statutory obligations, and urgent need for Court intervention to uphold election integrity. It emphasizes Judicial Watch’s historical commitment to lawful electoral processes and its established interest in ensuring compliance with federal election laws.
While the Amicus Brief would necessitate booklet formatting and additional production time, it remains an option for providing a strong legal perspective to assist the Court in understanding the broader national significance of these issues. The brief also integrates key precedents and statutory references that reinforce Judicial Watch’s position on timely judicial action.
Documents Included in This Submission
Motion for Leave to Intervene
This document details Judicial Watch’s substantial interest in the case, its history of advocacy for election integrity, and the urgent need for judicial intervention. The Motion outlines the DOJ’s deferral policy issues and alleged procedural obstructions by the Clerk’s Office, advocating for Judicial Watch to intervene to ensure timely judicial review.
Request for Expedited Consideration
This request underscores the immediate risk of irreparable harm due to the approaching election and DOJ’s current deferral policy. It appeals for the Court’s expedited handling of the case to safeguard election integrity and public confidence.
Appendices A through D
Appendix A: Summary of Judicial Watch’s Record in Election Integrity
Demonstrates Judicial Watch’s substantial interest and past successes in enforcing the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) across several states, including Pennsylvania, and its pivotal role in maintaining accurate voter rolls.
Appendix B: Excerpts from DOJ CRM PIN ECB Manual (8th Edition, 2017)
Contains key sections from the DOJ’s policy manual outlining its deferral policy for election investigations, highlighting conflicts with federal mandates and the urgency for timely action.
Appendix C: Excerpts from the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)
Relevant NVRA provisions that reinforce the importance of voter roll maintenance and the federal obligation for prompt investigations to protect lawful voting.
Appendix D: Allegations of Procedural Obstruction by Supreme Court Clerk Scott S. Harris
A timeline and documented summary of alleged delays and rejections by the Clerk’s Office, which potentially compromised Petitioners’ access to timely judicial review and due process.
Draft Amicus Brief
Action Requested
Please review the attached documents and consider proceeding with the Motion for Leave to Intervene and Request for Expedited Consideration route. Filing these documents electronically with SCOTUS is imperative to ensure they are received and reviewed without delay, maximizing the potential for a favorable and timely outcome.
These filings are structured to present a compelling case for intervention, grounded in Judicial Watch’s long standing role in upholding election integrity and advocating for transparent and fair judicial processes. The package also highlights procedural and constitutional concerns that align with SCOTUS precedents, enhancing the likelihood of securing expedited relief.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this urgent matter. Should you require further clarification or additional support in preparing these submissions, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Warm regards,
Gregory Stenstrom, Pro Se, 856-264-5495, gregorystenstrom@gmail.com
1541 Farmers Lane, Glen Mills, PA, 19342
Appendix
1–Gregory-Stenstrom-SCOTUS-Disclosure-Letter-01NOV2024
3–Federal-Prosecution-of-Election-Offenses-DOJ-CRM-PIN-ECB-Eighth-Edition-Dec-2017
4–Justice-Secured-Writ-In-Re-Gregory-Stenstrom-et-al-04OCT2024-final-filed
5–Motion-to-Expedite-Writ-14OCT2024-filed-bates
6–Appendix-A
Summary of Judicial Watch’s Record in Election Integrity
Demonstrates Judicial Watch’s substantial interest and past successes in enforcing the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) across several states, including Pennsylvania, and its pivotal role in maintaining accurate voter rolls.
7–Appendix-B Excerpts from DOJ CRM PIN ECB Manual (8th Edition, 2017)
Contains key sections from the DOJ’s policy manual outlining its deferral policy for election investigations, highlighting conflicts with federal mandates and the urgency for timely action.
8–Appendix-C
Excerpts from the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)
Relevant NVRA provisions that reinforce the importance of voter roll maintenance and the federal obligation for prompt investigations to protect lawful voting.
9–Appendix-D
Allegations of Procedural Obstruction by Supreme Court Clerk Scott S. Harris
A timeline and documented summary of alleged delays and rejections by the Clerk’s Office, which potentially compromised Petitioners’ access to timely judicial review and due process.
11–Request-for-Expedited-Consideration-in-In-Re-Gregory-Stenstrom-24-430-by-Judicial-Watch-Inc
12–Search-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
